Rich, step back and re-read this entire thread.
The first mention of Katrina on here were by people complaining about others making comparisons. Note that there had been no comparisons made here--it went straight to complaining about the comparisons.
I said the comparisons are OK--and then said that the only thing truly inappropriate is ripping others for making the comparisons.
You ripped me for making comparisons. Then Eddie, despite opening with "It is hard to compare Sandy with Katrina and Ike," proceeds to make several more comparisons, after which you said that Eddie understood your post. On the other hand, if you find the fact that I made a comparison objectionable, then the fact that Eddie made a comparison should also be objectionable.
Which is it? If Eddie's post is OK with you, then that means that making comparisons is OK with you--in which case, you should have no beef with what I said.
Hugh--I'll grant that the death tolls were not comparable. To me, that points more to the fact that evacuation orders were more properly followed/enforced this time around. But you, too, violate your own statements. You say "these are not comparable", immediately after making comparisons. You can't have your cake and eat it too.