You were comparing wind damage to water damage in specific storms, and that's what I consider comparisons. One can easily say that all disasters cause damage and often deaths and that is not a comparison just a general statement of fact without implying any disaster was any worse than another.
Dictionary.com said:verb (used with object)
1.
to compare in order to show unlikeness or differences; note the opposite natures, purposes, etc., of: Contrast the political rights of Romans and Greeks.
verb (used without object)
2.
to exhibit unlikeness on comparison with something else; form a contrast.
Google Definitions said:Synonyms:
noun. opposition - antithesis - opposite - contradistinction
verb. compare - collate - oppose
Go ahead - shoot me.
So my question is: What is the purpose of making comparisons of Sandy to Katrina, to Andrew, or to the Japanese Tsunami? They all happened at different times, different locations and the costs in property damage and human lives was enormous.
Why not simply ASK them why they feel the comparison is valid/necessary to better understand what they are trying to say instead of assuming there is disrespectful intentions or inferences.
...before anyone starts making comparisons as to which disaster was worse!
Sandy is more likely to have a direct impact on a presidential election than Katrina did.
Enter your email address to join: