I'm betting that this internet myth morphed out of another actual issue that has come forth off and on over the last several years, particularly since the Democrat Party regained majority control of Congress in 2006, and this issue seems to pop up just about every quarter after the oil companies and other big corporations release their quarterly statements.
That's when we start to hear the demagogues spewing their horse squeeze about "record profits", "excessive profits", "windfall profits", and such. And then come the call for a "windfall profit tax" on oil companies and other "evil" corporations, usually from Democrats and a few RHINOs. If this kind of tax is passed, it will hurt anyone with a 401K, a union pension, or just about any other pension or retirement plan, because investments in oil companies and other "evil" corporations make up a large part of those types of retirement plans.
This is nothing more than another "spread the wealth" Marxist/Socialist forced income redistribution scheme. So if Pelosi was one of those calling for a windfall profit tax, then she is indeed a Marxist/Socialist.
The only "retirement fund" that Democrats "want us to have" is a gov't-controlled retirement, so that we're more dependent on gov't and to buy them more votes and power. Can you really say that you support such a thing, given what a mess gov't has made of Social Security over the last 70 years (under a largely Democrat-controlled Congress, with the exception of 1994-2006)?
"Giving it to private investors" means letting individuals have the freedom to invest their own money, not trust gov't to safeguard it. I sure as heck don't trust that there will be SS for me when I retire, what I'm being taxed on now is paying for current SS recipients.