Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
WMD--iraq weapons of mass destruction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Rogers" data-source="post: 828747" data-attributes="member: 60724"><p>Here's the way I look at it all:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Iraq was a threat to stability in the Middle East. They were once an ally that we propped up to help against Russia, but once that conflict ended they got a little too froggy for their own good.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Saddam needed to be taken out. When our puppet dictators get out of hand, that's needed. 'Nuff said.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Saddam was hung. I saw the video. His sons KIA, I saw the pictures.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The country liberated, and turned into ground-zero for the "war on terror" (read: our presence there was a calling card for Middle East dirtbags).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Things are better in Iraq now. We have, if nothing else, created a presence and an infrastructure in the Middle East that will likely be needed over the next 30 years as crude becomes even more scarce.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Would I like to have seen things done differently? Sure.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Do I care whether there were, or were not WMDs in Iraq? Not in the least!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>TJR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thomas Rogers, post: 828747, member: 60724"] Here's the way I look at it all: Iraq was a threat to stability in the Middle East. They were once an ally that we propped up to help against Russia, but once that conflict ended they got a little too froggy for their own good. Saddam needed to be taken out. When our puppet dictators get out of hand, that's needed. 'Nuff said. Saddam was hung. I saw the video. His sons KIA, I saw the pictures. The country liberated, and turned into ground-zero for the "war on terror" (read: our presence there was a calling card for Middle East dirtbags). Things are better in Iraq now. We have, if nothing else, created a presence and an infrastructure in the Middle East that will likely be needed over the next 30 years as crude becomes even more scarce. Would I like to have seen things done differently? Sure. Do I care whether there were, or were not WMDs in Iraq? Not in the least! TJR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
WMD--iraq weapons of mass destruction
Top