Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
SportTrac Discussion
Electrical
Supreme Court Ruling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Todd Cloutier" data-source="post: 797102" data-attributes="member: 53897"><p>That was precisely my point as well. It seems to me that Stevens, in his dissent, is taking a very literal interpretation of the 2nd amendment; saying that the Framers were limiting possession of arms to the people as a collective, not as individuals, and only in the context of the States maintaining an organized militia.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Scalia, on the other hand, says that the right to bear arms is an individual right, and that the regulated militia provides context, but not limitation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Todd Cloutier, post: 797102, member: 53897"] That was precisely my point as well. It seems to me that Stevens, in his dissent, is taking a very literal interpretation of the 2nd amendment; saying that the Framers were limiting possession of arms to the people as a collective, not as individuals, and only in the context of the States maintaining an organized militia. Scalia, on the other hand, says that the right to bear arms is an individual right, and that the regulated militia provides context, but not limitation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
SportTrac Discussion
Electrical
Supreme Court Ruling
Top