Johnny O
Well-Known Member
What happens when activists take over govt bureaucracys that can make law without going through Congress.
So you thought you were going fishing?
- Thread starter Johnny O
- Start date
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
Jerry Johnson
Active Member
This administration scares me. He is very much driven by a very left wing agenda. Pretty soon it will be illegal to eat meat.
Jose Santana
Active Member
Just more right wing propaganda, scare tactics...
Kevin Lang
Well-Known Member
Yes, it's this new kind of fear-mongering propaganda known as the Truth.
Once again BHO has reneged on a promise of transparency and the Peoples' involvement in lawmaking.
But hey, we aren't smart enough to fish, just as we aren't smart enough to know that we need his health care plan.
What is hilarious is that the government elements tasked with making these high-handed laws concerning the enivironment don't know jack and actually hurt the environment. The Smoky the Bear fronted program to prevent wildfires actually retarded our ecosystems as certain areas naturally burn down and regrow, a cycle repeated for millenia that they decided they needed to change...with an anthropomorphic bear in jeans.
This article speaks the truth, corroborated by history. If you give the Government an elastic clause about protecting watersheds, they'll abuse it and come right up to the crick in your backyard and restrict what you can do with it.
Once again BHO has reneged on a promise of transparency and the Peoples' involvement in lawmaking.
But hey, we aren't smart enough to fish, just as we aren't smart enough to know that we need his health care plan.
What is hilarious is that the government elements tasked with making these high-handed laws concerning the enivironment don't know jack and actually hurt the environment. The Smoky the Bear fronted program to prevent wildfires actually retarded our ecosystems as certain areas naturally burn down and regrow, a cycle repeated for millenia that they decided they needed to change...with an anthropomorphic bear in jeans.
This article speaks the truth, corroborated by history. If you give the Government an elastic clause about protecting watersheds, they'll abuse it and come right up to the crick in your backyard and restrict what you can do with it.
Jose Santana
Active Member
More info on the fishing ban:
Ahh KL.... It's scare tactics...:smack:
http://news.spreadit.org/obama-fishing-ban/
http://news.puggal.com/obama-fishing-ban-26390/
http://philly2philly.com/politics_community/politics_community_articles/2010/3/9/43364/anti_obama_bloggers_running_wild_irres
http://www.catholic.org/hf/home/story.php/story.php?id=35709
http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=obama+fishing+ban
joseymack
Ahh KL.... It's scare tactics...:smack:
http://news.spreadit.org/obama-fishing-ban/
http://news.puggal.com/obama-fishing-ban-26390/
http://philly2philly.com/politics_community/politics_community_articles/2010/3/9/43364/anti_obama_bloggers_running_wild_irres
http://www.catholic.org/hf/home/story.php/story.php?id=35709
http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=obama+fishing+ban
joseymack
Kevin Lang
Well-Known Member
As I said, scare tactics known as the Truth.
Of course it's supposed to scare us, scare us into action. But scare tactics are only a bad thing when they're lies.
This is, for the 3rd time, true. Look, you even corroborated that for me.
So, what is your stance on this again, besides repeating the obvious that we all agree upon?
Of course it's supposed to scare us, scare us into action. But scare tactics are only a bad thing when they're lies.
This is, for the 3rd time, true. Look, you even corroborated that for me.
So, what is your stance on this again, besides repeating the obvious that we all agree upon?
Robert Thomas
Well-Known Member
They will have to pry my fishing pole from my cold dead fillet knife slashing hands.
:fire::fire::fire::fire:
:fire::fire::fire::fire:
Jose Santana
Active Member
KL the story reads as if OBAMA just banned fishing in the entire ocean.... That's exactly how it was trying to be presented.... How ridiculous, if there is talk of bans on certain fish or areas it is no different than anything we see and have today.... I agree with redfish that they would have to pry the pole from my dead hands, but if they said no more taking of endangered species such as blue fin tuna, or right whales than I would except that as trying to save a species rather than the BIG government trying to take away our rights..
Scare Tactics:haveabeer:
joseymack
Scare Tactics:haveabeer:
joseymack
Kevin Lang
Well-Known Member
The article is informing us of the removal of public input--an obama promise--from the lawmaking process, and the elasticity of the law, which could lead to a scenario where you cannot fish lawfully on your own property. It's not far-fetched at all.
Conservation is awesome, Preservation is retarded. This law tends to the Preservation side of the spectrum, which ultimately serves to keep and protect wildlife without humans being able to enjoy--and more importantly manage--its growth.
The article talks about the huge voting base of fishers...I couldn't see how any fisherman, who is stereotypically not a left-winger, would have voted PrObama in the first place (meaning that them rising to an occasion now would do nothing new), but now I can see that it is possible, though I can't understand it. Thanks for that elucidation.
These laws won't stop anyone who wants these fish from getting them, just another unnecessary and elastic law to be exploited down the road to harass law abiding citizens.
Conservation is awesome, Preservation is retarded. This law tends to the Preservation side of the spectrum, which ultimately serves to keep and protect wildlife without humans being able to enjoy--and more importantly manage--its growth.
The article talks about the huge voting base of fishers...I couldn't see how any fisherman, who is stereotypically not a left-winger, would have voted PrObama in the first place (meaning that them rising to an occasion now would do nothing new), but now I can see that it is possible, though I can't understand it. Thanks for that elucidation.
These laws won't stop anyone who wants these fish from getting them, just another unnecessary and elastic law to be exploited down the road to harass law abiding citizens.
Bill Barber
Well-Known Member
nobody can deny that the worlds fish stocks have been overfished.
look at the cod on the east coast, are no more (read the book, COD).
Look at the great Salmon runs calif used to have, have fished every salmon river on the west coast for at least 50 yrs, the salmon are gone.
Something needs to be done ASAP, or fish are going to become extinct.JMO
look at the cod on the east coast, are no more (read the book, COD).
Look at the great Salmon runs calif used to have, have fished every salmon river on the west coast for at least 50 yrs, the salmon are gone.
Something needs to be done ASAP, or fish are going to become extinct.JMO
