Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
SportTrac Discussion
Engine & Drivetrain
???s' about diffferent cat convertors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scott degroot" data-source="post: 987305" data-attributes="member: 66039"><p>Eddie,</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is my understanding that ceramic converters are old school and as such have the poorest flow. Of the other 2 that you mentioned I have only heard the term metallic substrate. These cats do the same job as the ceramic ones but can withstand more punishment, flow better and are also physically smaller. Ceramic converters are the cheapest to make but that is about the only advantage to a ceramic converter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scott degroot, post: 987305, member: 66039"] Eddie, It is my understanding that ceramic converters are old school and as such have the poorest flow. Of the other 2 that you mentioned I have only heard the term metallic substrate. These cats do the same job as the ceramic ones but can withstand more punishment, flow better and are also physically smaller. Ceramic converters are the cheapest to make but that is about the only advantage to a ceramic converter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
SportTrac Discussion
Engine & Drivetrain
???s' about diffferent cat convertors
Top