LOL

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Frank screwyourednecks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
539
Reaction score
1
Location
Munster, IN
I hate to say "I told ya so "..



To all of you I have tried to enlighten for the past several years. Thanks for all the fun.



Oh and one more thing...LOL



The Yankee Union thug left liberal commie socialist athiest was right all along . I freaking love it.



I win.



Frank



:bwahaha:
 
I win.



Frank



You have won nothing. Except, your taxes paying for an entitled generation...

Wait till you get my age. Then you will understand...........:throwup::btddhorse:
 
Frank,

You actually lost as we all did.



Remember that Obama did not get much accomplished in his first 4 year term, and with the sme Republican Congress, he will get even less done in the next 4 years as a Lame Duck President.



The country needed a President that can cut the deficit, and stop giving away taxpayer money to the 47% who do not work, and even stopped looking for work.



If you have a job, you will pay more taxes like the rest of us do. If you are part of the 47% who do not work but live like a leach off the rest of the working Americans, you might find your benefits cut when Congress refuses to pass the President's bloated budget until he agrees to some deep budget cuts.



He claims he wants to work with the GOP, but he said that after his first election and was completely unwilling to compromise on anything. I'm sure the GOP Congress remembers those first 4 years, and Obama will have to get down on his knees and grovel before Congress will give him another dime. Of course Obama will blame Congress, but pointing his finger at Congress will not fly for another 4 years.



In this case, nobody wins, and everybody loses.



Just as Romney said, He would not get the votes of the 47% of Americans who do not pay any taxes. A simple statement of facts:



"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always count on the support of Paul" - George Bernard Shaw



In other words: Why would you not vote for the guy who is giving you money for doing nothing, with the money he takes from others who worked to earn it?



...Rich
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just as Romney said, He would not get the votes of the 47% of Americans who do not pay any taxes.



I still have the video stuck in my head, of. The woman who said, obamma is going to buy my gas and pay for my cell phone....:angry:...one of those 47%ers'
 
Frank,

Obama also got 93% of the Black vote, 76% of the Hispanic vote...many of whom are a big part of the 47% who do not pay any taxes.



51% of the popular vote is about as small of a winning margin as you can get and that is just squeaking by.... With all the $ Trillions in taxpayer money that Obama gave away in the form of handouts and entitlements to the 47% of no-tax payers makes me wonder just how much each of the votes he got just to inch out Romney is costing us? I'm guessing we taxpayers will be paying that bill long after Obama is gone.



...Rich
 




Can we please turn off his access to this site! Do we really want someone on here that trolls and taunts and provides no other real value, and has no other real purpose.



Good riddance to him.



TJR
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TJR, I see your point--but some of the people on this sight with right-leaning perspectives respond to him and others in equally offensive and incoherent ways. If Frank gets banned, they should too.
 
Can we please turn off his access to this site! Do we really want someone on here that trolls and taunts and provides no other real value, and has no other real purpose.



Good riddance to him.



+1
 
I havent been banned because I use no profanity, dont personally slander anyone. and I adhere to the rules.



I understand that I have differing opinions on things. But by me having the chutspah to express my opinions does not warrant removal from this board. I think there is a huge instance of SOUR GRAPES with what happened with the election. but that is moot.



I refuse to let the extreme right wingers post things on here without getting a retort.



 
Richard.. Yes it was close. Without the Citizens United ruling. Conservative Super PAC s and voting suppression efforts by the right. I thing the Presiden could have gotten 70 percent of the pop vote and 80 of the electorate. The die hard right wing is fading into oblivion. Unless thier Religious, anti-worker mantra is forsaken. The political losses will mount up.





Sour Grapes
 
I refuse to let the extreme right wingers post things on here without getting a retort.



Frank, I've found in my life that regardless of a person's opinion on any subject, one of the biggest steps a person achieves in his/her maturation as an individual comes when they realize that, while it's important to stand up for what you believe in, it's not always necessary to have the last word after you've expressed your point. It's not always necessary to be "getting a retort".
 
Frank, respectfully I must tell you that you act like an arse hole (no profanity, didn't call you a name, thus within the rules). You act like a child (again, no name calling, just an observation). You taunt and you troll, and that is disrepectful, and THAT actually is against the rules.



An intelligent discussion is one thing. A "Nah-Nah-Nah-Nah" post ment to infurriate is childish and disrespectful. No sour grapes.



Whatever happened to gracious "winning?" That's respectful. I applaud Obama for running a great campaign. No sour grapes here. I predicted Romney would lose when he took the hard-line, Conservative Christian stance on many non-issues, and as such he lost many of the female votes, of immigrants, of moderates. Had he not done that, he would have "won."



Either way, this country is a long way from "winning", IMHO. Hopefully the certainty of another 4 years and the focus of Obama on creating a legacy and not on getting re-elected (and no longer the need for R members of Congress to be obstructive in hopes to prevent Obama re-election) we might be able to get something done in D.C.



In many ways a single term for Obama, then a first term for Romney wouldn't really help this country as much as an Obama 2nd term for the reasons I mentioned.



TJR
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whatever happened to gracious "winning?"

TJR, I agree with your assessment on Frank--but I think you'd agree that there have been some pretty classless examples of non-gracious "winning" by some of the people still active on this board during election cycles which ran more red. While Frank shouldn't do act towards them the way he is, to a certain extent some of the people he's addressing are reaping what they've sown.
 
At least you acknowledge my winning. I agree with Bill V in the fact that I am always outnumbered on here by rabid right leaning people. The things I have seen posted on here are breathtakingly ignorant.



I am enjoying the finger pointing and complaining coming from the staunch Repubs. Yea sure. But it does not take away the fact that the platform of anti worker-uber religious-tax breaks for the wealthy-that they have will someday manifest itself and hurt America again. Thats sad.



History repeats itself. and we certainly are moving into a more liberal era. Theres a long way to go before we even get close to the center. Let alone swinging left. But progress has been made obviously by America REJECTING Romneys anti worker agenda. Think about it.



I can only hope that the hardline Repubs dont become bitter, its never fun to be on the outside looking in. But open minds can make it less painful. Embrace the change and be positive. Your turn may come again someday. Its a 2 party system
 
Considering the Republicans' primary objective for the past four years was to make Obama a one-term president, I blame them for nothing getting done. About a year ago, Obama threw up his arms and said, "I give up trying to work with them."



At this moment, Obama and Boehner are planning on meeting at the White House next week to open up discussions again. Now that their objective deadline about the one-term thing has past, there's no reason NOT to work with Obama. If Obama and Boehner's speeches were sincere, this should be the beginning of getting shit done. Finally.
 
Mark is right. It seems like this is the time to work together. If the Repubs dont it leaves no doubt that they do NOT have the citizens (you and me) best interest in mind.



The American people have re elected Pres Obama because they want the wealthy to pay thier share. Plain and simple. We have a 2 party system. Its the working classes turn to see some oppurtunity
 
Frank said:
The American people have re elected Pres Obama because they want the wealthy to pay thier share. Plain and simple. We have a 2 party system. Its the working classes turn to see some oppurtunity



It must be good to see things so clearly, so plain and simply. I do hope we solve our deficit problem, and I have no problem with the wealthy paying more, as long as I'm not one of those wealthy. I already pay enough. :)



TJR
 
Top