Ok, Bob. :back2topic: I agree. Enforce all laws as written. Any other "migration" of this size would be considered an invasion. The drug violence at the borders has in effect made it a violent seizure of American land. We can just continue to ignore it because its a political sore spot for both major parties, though. I believe that is how it will continue to play out, unfortunately.
I thought my comments about education were on topic, though. It is irrelevant who goes to college, IMO. College has been made a commodity in this country and who receives it, who pays for it, and the citizenship status of those involved is irrelevant, IMO. Citizenship and purchasing education is no more important to me than citizenship to buy a Big Mac. And make no mistake, college is a purchasable commodity. So, I don't think the education part is relevant to the amnesty debate.
Neither is the "stealing our jobs" argument. Make yourself more valuable than a poorly educated, low-skilled, desperate enough to cross a desert, Mexican. If you are losing your job to illegal immigrants, you either think your skills are worth more than they are, or you are lazy. Again, JMO.
I oppose illegal immigration and amnesty for illegals for two reasons alone.
1. "ILLEGAL"
2. We can't afford our entitlement programs as is. We can't add to it.