Anybody seen this Engineering feat?...

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Tom R

Active Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Messages
155
Reaction score
4
Location
Goose Creek, SC
[Broken External Image]:



The photograph displayed above is one of a real structure, a kilometer-long "concrete bathtub" water bridge over the Elbe River in Germany that joins the Elbe-Havel canal to the Mittelland canal near the eastern town of Magdeburg.



As Deutsche Welle described the bridge upon its completion in 2003: Taking six years to build and costing around half a billion euros, the massive undertaking will connect Berlin's inland harbor with the ports along the Rhine river. At the center of the project is Europe's longest water bridge measuring in just shy of a kilometer at 918 meters. The huge tub to transport ships over the Elbe took 24,000 metric tons of steel and 68,000 cubic meters of concrete to build.



The water bridge will enable river barges to avoid a lengthy and sometimes unreliable passage along the Elbe. Shipping can often come to a halt on the stretch if the river's water mark falls to unacceptably low levels.



Plans for joining the two canals had been conceived as far back as 1919, and construction on such a project began during the 1930s, but first World War II and then the post-war division of Germany put the project on hold until after German reunification was achieved in the 1990s.



http://www.snopes.com/photos/architecture/waterbridge.asp#photo says it's True for those that like to debunk everything.



_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



To those who appreciate engineering projects, here's a puzzle for you armchair engineers and physicists.



Did that bridge have to be designed to withstand the additional weight of ship and barge traffic, or just the weight of the water?



Answer below.....





































































Answer: It only needs to be designed to withstand the weight of the water! Why? A ship always displaces an amount of water that weighs the same as the ship, regardless of how heavily a ship may be loaded.



Remember your high school physics, and the fly in an enclosed bottle project? Similarly, the super sensitive scale proved that it didn't make any difference whether the fly was sitting on the bottom, walking up the side, or flying around. The bottle, air, and fly were a single unit of mass and always weighed the same.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I actually knew the answer. You should have waited to post the answer. If a boat weiged more then the water it displaced, the ship would sink.





Tom
 
Answer: It only needs to be designed to withstand the weight of the water! Why? A ship always displaces an amount of water that weighs the same as the ship, regardless of how heavily a ship may be loaded.



That seems like part of the answer.



The other part is that the canal is not actually a "concrete bathtub", which is enclosed on both ends (capturing a set volume of water). When a ship enters the canal, the water it displaces is free to exit at either end, keeping the canal water level the same.



If it really was a 1km bathtub full of water and you dropped a ship in, the mass of both the ship and water would be felt on the supporting structure. (As with the fly in the bottle)



edit: BTW, that is cool. I'd not seen that before.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Isn't it amazing that a country like Germany can build something like that, but in the USA, we can not build a dike to handle a storm like the one that hit NO.



Pretty sad isn't it? In our country, we are too busy with other "important" things .





Tom
 
I agree, fy10lyny. If the water was not displaced OUT of the "bathtub", then the weight of the contents would increase, thus having to be considered in the design.
 
Yea Jeff C but here in Assachusettes we can't even build a underwater tunnel that does not leak. The tunnels builts in NYC and even here at the turn of the century are structurally more sound than this ted Williams tunnel... What a joke this whole big dig has been
 
You nailed it, fy10lyny. IF this bridge is open at both ends, then the original answer is true. But if it's not open--for example, if there are locks at both ends with pumps used to raise the boats to the level of the bridge, then the full weight of the ships needs to be considered.



That said, in general, the weight of the ships is going to be rather insignificant when compared to the weight of the water. So even if the bridge is closed at both ends, structural support calculations won't need to change significantly (if at all) to account for the ships. Particularly when you take into consideration the safety factors that need to be used on projects such as this.
 
Jeff C, how old are the dykes/levis around the Netherlands? They still seam to work.
 
How many Cat5 hurricanes do the Netherlands get? I know all about the system over there, since most of my mom's family is from there, we get to hear all about em and watch all kinds of "fun" videos, lol.
 
Top