Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
SportTrac Discussion
Engine & Drivetrain
The Law of Supply and Demand At Work
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Mastrocco" data-source="post: 565315" data-attributes="member: 54595"><p>Federal Law requires a union to represent all members of a class of worker represented by the Union whether that person is a union member or not. If the union must represent the person, why shouldn't that person be required to be a union member? If they don't want to be a union member, shouldn't the law allow the union to refuse representation to a non-member?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And if a company wants to sign an agreement with a union that states they will only hire people that will join the union, then why shouldn't they be allowed to do just that? Isn't that the right of a company - to make whatever agreement with its workers it wants to? Shouldn't a company be able to put any restrictions it decides are reasonable on who it will and will not employ? Closed shops are agreements between a union and an employer, aren't they? So why should someone else dictate to both parties, teh union and the employer, they can't do that? Isn't that a form of restraint of trade? Aren't all you guys AGAINST the government telling a company what it can and cannot do?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Isn't a person that doesn't want to join a union free to find employment elsewhere if they come across a closed shop?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Devil's advocate, here...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Mastrocco, post: 565315, member: 54595"] Federal Law requires a union to represent all members of a class of worker represented by the Union whether that person is a union member or not. If the union must represent the person, why shouldn't that person be required to be a union member? If they don't want to be a union member, shouldn't the law allow the union to refuse representation to a non-member? And if a company wants to sign an agreement with a union that states they will only hire people that will join the union, then why shouldn't they be allowed to do just that? Isn't that the right of a company - to make whatever agreement with its workers it wants to? Shouldn't a company be able to put any restrictions it decides are reasonable on who it will and will not employ? Closed shops are agreements between a union and an employer, aren't they? So why should someone else dictate to both parties, teh union and the employer, they can't do that? Isn't that a form of restraint of trade? Aren't all you guys AGAINST the government telling a company what it can and cannot do? Isn't a person that doesn't want to join a union free to find employment elsewhere if they come across a closed shop? Devil's advocate, here... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
SportTrac Discussion
Engine & Drivetrain
The Law of Supply and Demand At Work
Top