Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
SportTrac Discussion
General Sport Trac Discussion
Low, low prices: Target beats Wal-Mart...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Lang" data-source="post: 958215" data-attributes="member: 65699"><p>If Wal-Mart were to unionize, would not all of these current "undesireable" employees be grandfathered into the union, and gain all the protections that unions are notorious for offering? (Specifically, job "protection"?) If wal-mart retains them, and pays them more, have we accomplished anything besides the proliferation of unionization?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right now, if those Wal-Marts <em>wanted</em> to, they could fire the dregs of society in their employ and work to acquire some better employees. If they refuse to do this, and Target conquers them, isn't that just capitalism at work? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unionization itself could kill wal-mart--could it remain nearly as profitable with all the demands the union will make? Wal-Mart is gargantuan, but then again, so were the Big Three automakers. The union, representing the largest importer of Chinese goods in the USA, would inevitably be a puppet of politics which has never been good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Lang, post: 958215, member: 65699"] If Wal-Mart were to unionize, would not all of these current "undesireable" employees be grandfathered into the union, and gain all the protections that unions are notorious for offering? (Specifically, job "protection"?) If wal-mart retains them, and pays them more, have we accomplished anything besides the proliferation of unionization? Right now, if those Wal-Marts [i]wanted[/i] to, they could fire the dregs of society in their employ and work to acquire some better employees. If they refuse to do this, and Target conquers them, isn't that just capitalism at work? Unionization itself could kill wal-mart--could it remain nearly as profitable with all the demands the union will make? Wal-Mart is gargantuan, but then again, so were the Big Three automakers. The union, representing the largest importer of Chinese goods in the USA, would inevitably be a puppet of politics which has never been good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
SportTrac Discussion
General Sport Trac Discussion
Low, low prices: Target beats Wal-Mart...
Top