Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Fighting for All of America
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Rogers" data-source="post: 568281" data-attributes="member: 60724"><p>Caymen says: </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, please quote the posts then!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you find more than 5 legit, direct statements on this board by people that state that "Union works" are unskilled, lazy, and worthless, then I will eat crow. But the must be direct and not general, nor observational.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As I said, to be legit and direct in my mind, it has to be accusatory of "all", "most" or even that ambiquous "many", and NOT simply a statement about observiations of "one person and one incident". Nor can they be generalizations like the one where several discussed if a lower-skilled union member should make more than a teacher or firefighter. I say these are exempt, because these are EXACTLY the types of comments which are not direct. They are simply people discussing a topic and we should be able accept such comments without any implied harsh intent, nor return them with sarcasm and contempt.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I suspect as you go through and do your search Caymen, and post a few back and we discuss them (if you want to do this) you may find that what you thought was a direct JAB was more anectodal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am eager to see what others have said in an abridged manner.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>TJR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thomas Rogers, post: 568281, member: 60724"] Caymen says: Okay, please quote the posts then! If you find more than 5 legit, direct statements on this board by people that state that "Union works" are unskilled, lazy, and worthless, then I will eat crow. But the must be direct and not general, nor observational. As I said, to be legit and direct in my mind, it has to be accusatory of "all", "most" or even that ambiquous "many", and NOT simply a statement about observiations of "one person and one incident". Nor can they be generalizations like the one where several discussed if a lower-skilled union member should make more than a teacher or firefighter. I say these are exempt, because these are EXACTLY the types of comments which are not direct. They are simply people discussing a topic and we should be able accept such comments without any implied harsh intent, nor return them with sarcasm and contempt. I suspect as you go through and do your search Caymen, and post a few back and we discuss them (if you want to do this) you may find that what you thought was a direct JAB was more anectodal. I am eager to see what others have said in an abridged manner. TJR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Fighting for All of America
Top